• Bribe Fighter
  • 11 years ago
  • 10929 views

My husband is a bribe fighter. He is working as Inspector, Central…

Reported on December 5, 2013 from Aurangabad , Bihar  ι Report #38292

My husband is a bribe fighter. He is working as Inspector, Central Excise, Aurangabad. During the Vigilance Awareness Week it was told that bribe cases are to be reported with the evidence or no evidence if not known. In the cases where there is no evidence it was told that itwill be the department onus  to verify and collect evidence and will book the irregular doers and the bribe fighters will be prtected as a move towards zero tolerance for corruption. Riding over this assurance my husband shared the information, observations and back whispers of his office by putting in writing with his union and Commissioner,  Central Excise,  Aurangabad.
The General Secretary of the Union Mr Vatan S Kamble, General Secretary,
NonGazetted, Central Exise Officer I.e Inspectors Association got reverified the facts from other members  of the Offcice and typed one letter adressed to Commissioner, Central Excise,  Aurangabad and made corrections on this draft and told my husband Shri. Yeshwant Sadashiv

Hotkar that in short timehe will meet the Commissioner Shri. D.S.Negi and will see that all the irregularities put up by husband are addressed and gave the copy of this his hand corrected draft. Later on this meber made certain adjustment with the administration and from that day onwards he became the partner in the share of corruption from the administration besides bagging top price postings and staying in sensitive postings as if he had been the exception to rules. In turn Mr Vatan Kamble gave the administration on his letter pad of the Union the appreciation certificates for the incumbent Commissioner and the administration.

As a voice against this sixteen officers the members of the Union started a move of signature movement where sixteen officers signed and the other members were shut giving the fear of the administration and lure by hook or crook.

During the posting in the range my husband observed that MrsJanaki Arunkumar,  Commissioner has instructed the officrrs underneath her to realise the coupons of Rs 5000 from each industry for some south based institution.My husband didnot took part.My husband also observed that his Range Superintendent Mr Anil Mukunddas Malu and Mr Deepak Jadhav were signing on the export documents of various assessees of the range from the office table without sealing the export consignments/ containers and the sealing plier the government property were allowed to be with the industries for which my husband objected. The incharge Assistant Commissioners Mr R S Sanghia, Mr Man Singh and the Joint Commissioners didnot liked the objection of my husband because there earnings from the industry was going to effect instead my husband was advised to enjoy the opportunities. When my husband was not ready to go against the prescribed rules as per the CBEC Manual his charge was withdrawn and without diong any work he eeceived the Govt. Salary against the principlpes of Honble Supreme Court Judgement of "NO WORK NO PAY'.


However my husband continued with representating Mrs Janaki Arunkumar, Commissioner, Central Excise Mr Malu, Mr Jadhav and Mr Bengali, Assistant
Commissioner as a counter attack were harssing my husband by one or the other way.Atlast as a last resort to teach a lesson to my husband Mr Malu at the time leaving office passed atrocitic sentence for which my husband was requesting this officer not to do such acts otherwise my husband has to approach the competent authority. Afraid with this Mr Anil Mukunddas Malu filed false FIR against my huaband as he was objected for corruption
through various represemtation by my husband.

Having no alternative as the Commissioner was remaining passive but my husband could be trapped in the Court Hassles my husband finally made representation with the SC Commission Delhi, PM/FM and other competent officers for this matter and the irregularities,  the Commissioner Mrs Janaki Arunkumar inspite having no powers with her to issue the Disciplinary Ordet being irregularities of her also,; against the Vigilance Manual she issued chargesheet to my husband on 10.6.2008. The chargesheet dinot accompanied the necessary evidences and explanations as requested by my husband for filing reply, the Commissioner in hurry and after relieved from the post signed letter on 25.6.2008 when on records she was relieved from the post of Commissioner on 13.6.2008.

Instead of taking action against the erring officers reported above the department issued chargesheet as referred above as if like " PUTTING PERSON BEHIND BAR WHO HAD APPROACHED FOR HELP ",

Why Mrs Janaki Arunkumar donot took action against Mr Malu it was because he was the President of Superintendent Association. Why Mrs Janaki Arunkumar didnot take action against Mr Deepak Jadhav and Administrative Officer Mr Yeshwant Gedam it is because they besides giving money to Mts Janaki Arunkumar gave the plot at Aurangabd in VIMAN NAGAR, opposite airport,
aurangabad for which my husband has given Rs 10000 as earnest money.On stepping of Mrs Commissioners name my husband was given back his money and plot was given to Mrs Commissioner which was only for the staff as per the society rules which was later on changed. One of the reason of Mrs Kumar annoyance was my husband didnot easily stepped out from this deal.Later on all the members of the society of Mrs Kumar enjoyed and are still bagging precious postings against the sensitive and non sensitive norms prescribed by the department.

In order to purposely harass my husband the issues of 2005 representatioms were made part of chargesheet dtd 10.6.2008 without proper conduct of inquiry as required before issue of chargesheet arbitarily.The inquiry officer was instituted in Feb 2011 that is after six years for the matter of 2005.POINT TO BE NOTED HERE IS THAT THE MATTER OF 2005 I.E UPTO AUGUST 2007 WERE CLOSED BECAUSE MY HUSBAND WAS AWARDED THE ACP BENEFITS AFTER DUE CONDUCT OF DPC AND VIGILANCE CLEARANCE. To harass my husband the inquiry officer did the enquiiries of about 45 minutes on an average per inquiry and for such four inquiries he took 18 months because my husband didnot offerred any corruption.
The story of harassment of my husband didnot end here nay from here onwards it became bullet train from the slow passengee rail train

The defence of my husband by way of representation was very strong the Inquiry Officer Mr Kalicharan S Khartade gave report with speaking facts that the charges are not proved on dtd. 9.7.2912 to the Commissioner Mr Kumar Santosh. But Mr Kumar Santosh was very shrewd having worked in the vigilance unit of echelon level in the CBEC that it was very safe for him to drop the chargesheett on the basis of inquiry officer report but not without charging fees.The fees was determined as Rs 2 lacs not in cash but in the form of issuing sale deed of a prime plot (in my name) at Aurangabd besides National Highway in the heart of city and prime locality BUT MY HUSBAND DENIED.To earn bargaining time the inquiry officer report dtd. 9.7.2012 was purposely delayed and along with the TENTATIVE DECISION DTD 17.8.2012 was served to my husband on 22.8.2012 ie after one and half month

My husband junior was promoted on 6.7.2012 and for the pendency of chargesheet dtd. 4.6.2008 my husband promotion ( the honour for which he was waiting for more than 17 years of dedicated and devoyed service ) was stopped by the department. Therefore without expensing any time he prepared the reply and gave the same to ghe related section within one hour of receipt of tentative decision for reply.As I said earlier the shrewdness of Mr Kumar Santosh he purposely put the personal hearing on 14.9.2012 (only to bargain with my husband). It is very clear in my husband reply dtd. 22.8.2012 that the inquiry report and the tentative decision report in favour of my hsband decisionshould be given early in his favour.My husband in response to the personal hearing reiterated his say to pass in his favour early by taking into account each and every point/word of his representation.

Mr Kumar Santosh tried all his tactics to surmount pressure on my husband but as my husband didnot succumbed to this therefore what they did this time is that as the zerox copy of inquiry report is given and stated to signed copy of the delegated officer Mr Dinesh Pangarkar under the
covering letter of inked signature; the zerox copy of disciplinary order dtd 28.9.2012 is given by calling my husband in the Vigilance Section and taking the signature of my husband on the office copy of this disciplinary ordet wherein husband while recieving the copy has written on the office copy that ZEROX COPY OF DISCIPLINARY ORDER RECEIVED".

Later on again messages were passed to agree to terms of Mr Kumar Santosh, Commissioner, Central Excise, Aurangabad my husband didnot responded, my husband is given the zerox copy of SINGLE PAGE LTR DTD 19.11.2012 adressed to CC, Nagpur ON 20.11.2012.

My husband feeling disgusted, restless for insulted as the due honour to him is purposely delayed and when found himself believed that he is not going to get the promotion without fulfilling the demands of Mr Kumar Santosh and Company, he is forced to file the RTI.
After filing of RTI dtd 21.12.2012 by my husband in the office of Mr Kumar Santosh, Chief Commissioner Office- Nagpur/Mumbai-I, CBEC-New Delhi; Mr Kumar Santosh through his accounts section prepared a BACK DATED "PUNISHMENT PAY FIXATION ORDER office copy passed by Mr Dinesh Pangarkar, Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Aurangabad dtd. 21.11.2012 Attestes by ACAO, Central Excise and served this order on 7.1.2013. The logical point here is that
the basis to this order is given as the Disciplinary Order dtd. 16.11.2012 on the chargesheet dtd 4.6.2008 where on earlier on 28.9.2012 already has been passed and status on 7.1.2013 is
that it had been served to my husband on 28.9.2012 and attained full and permanent status. The new order is stated to impose penalty of reducing one increment for the period of two years.
THE POSITION AS ON DATE IS THAT THIS NEW DISCIPLINARY ORDER DTD 16.11.2012 IS NOT

SERVED TO MY HUSBAND AND ARBITARILY PROMOTION OF MY HUSBAND IS PUT IN DISPUTE ALONG WITH HIS REDUCTION OF PAY FROM SALARY OF JANUARY 2013.
The logical questions posed here is as under:-
1.why the disciplinary order dtd 16.11.2012 is not yet served?
2.why it took 47 days to serve the order dtd. 21.11.2012 on 7.1.2013 when my husband was not on leave?
3.If the order dtd 21.11.2012 has been passed why it is not implemented that is why pay is not reduced in the month of November 2012, if not in November 2012 then why not in December 2012.
4. How now in February 2013 a alert circular is issued that the inward/outward register of accounts section of Mr Kumar Santosh is lost and that to for the month of Nov and December 2013.


5. Why the related inspector of Vigilance Section Mr Patel applied for VRS at a young age and VRS also accepted immediately by Mr Kumar Santosh and and Mr Patel relieved from dutiea.
6.Why zerox copy of inquiry and earlier disciplinary order is given and next disciplinary order not served?


7.Why forensic ink, signature and handwriting expert regarding handwritten corrected draft of Mr Vatan Kamble, Signatures of Sixteen officers, ink dating as to whether Mrs Janaki Arunkumar signed on 13.6.2008 or 25.6.2008 ie on the date she is not the competent authority, signature comparison report on the zerox copy of disciplinary order dtd 28.9.2012 as to whether this are the signatures of Mr Kumar Santosh and the signaturres on the zerox copy of tje inquiry report dtd 9.7.2012 who is now IAS VIJAYWADA MR KALICHARAN S KHARTADE,.
8.As to from which authority Mr Kumar Santosh owes authority to impose penalty on my husband when the chargesheet didnot mention the contravention of CCS Rule, because after confirming the contravention of certain RULE penalty can be imposef forcontravention of it?
9. Overriding the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the RTI ACT, 2005; WHAT AUTHORITY authorises Mr Kumar Santosh to conduct preliminary inquiry against my husband.
There are also questions from which it can be proved as to how CORRURPTION IS ENFORCED.

it is requested yo all members to watch the hindi film KUDRAT KA KANOON.

It is requesfed to keep my name disclosed and extend whatever help to my husband and my husband may be contacted for more details and records but with the express permissionof the Department.

I have no legal knowledge but I have put my facts. It is requested to take action as deemed fit so
that I and my husband donot further land in trouble

My husband has represented to all the higher officers but invain and the VIGILANCE AEARENESS WEEK HAS ONLY BECAME YHE CELEBRATION has to be fully mained in the custody of the industries





Salary against the principlpes of Honble Supreme Court Judgement of "NO WORK NO PAY'.
However my husband continued with representating Mrs Janaki Arunkumar, Commissioner, Central Excise Mr Malu, Mr Jadhav and Mr Bengali, Assistant
Commissioner as a counter attack were harssing my husband by one or the other way.Atlast as a last resort to teach a lesson to my husband Mr Malu at the time leaving office passed atrocitic sentence for which my husband was requesting this officer not to do such acts otherwise my husband has to approach the competent authority. Afraid with this Mr Anil Mukunddas Malu filed false FIR against my huaband as he was objected for corruption
through various represemtation by my husband.

Having no alternative as the Commissioner was remaining passive but my husband could be trapped in the Court Hassles my husband finally made
representation with the SC Commission Delhi, PM/FM and other competent officers for this matter and the irregularities,  the Commissioner Mrs Janaki Arunkumar inspite having no powers with her to issue the Disciplinary Ordet being irregularities of her also,; against the Vigilance Manual she issued chargesheet to my husband on 10.6.2008. The chargesheet dinot accompanied the necessary evidences and explanations as requested by
my husband for filing reply, the Commissioner in hurry and after relieved from the post signed letter on 25.6.2008 when on records she was relieved from the post of Commissioner on 13.6.2008.

Instead of taking action against the erring officers reported above the department issued chargesheet as referred above as if like " PUTTING PERSON BEHIND BAR WHO HAD APPROACHED FOR HELP ",

Why Mrs Janaki Arunkumar donot took action against Mr Malu it was
because he was the President of Superintendent Association. Why Mrs Janaki Arunkumar didnot take action against Mr Deepak Jadhav and Administrative Officer Mr Yeshwant Gedam it is because they besides giving money to Mts Janaki Arunkumar gave the plot at Aurangabd in VIMAN
NAGAR, opposite airport, aurangabad for which my husband has given Rs 10000 as earnest money.On stepping of Mrs Commissioners name my husband was given back his money and plot was given to Mrs Commissioner which was only for the staff as per the society rules which was later on changed. One of the reason of Mrs Kumar annoyance was my
husband didnot easily stepped out from this deal.Later on all the members of the society of Mrs Kumar enjoyed and are still bagging precious postings against the sensitive and non sensitive norms prescribed by the department.
In order to purposely harass my husband the issues of 2005 representatioms were made part of chargesheet dtd 10.6.2008 without proper conduct of inquiry as required before issue of chargesheet arbitarily.The inquiry officer was instituted in Feb 2011 that is after six years for the matter of 2005.POINT TO BE NOTED HERE IS THAT THE MATTER OF 2005 I.E UPTO AUGUST 2007 WERE CLOSED BECAUSE MY HUSBAND WAS
AWARDED THE ACP BENEFITS AFTER DUE CONDUCT OF DPC AND VIGILANCE CLEARANCE. To harass my husband the inquiry officer did the enquiiries of about 45 minutes on an average per inquiry and for such four inquiries he took 18 months because my husband didnot offerred any corruption.
The story of harassment of my husband didnot end here nay from here onwards it became bullet train from the slow passengee rail train.

The defence of my husband by way of representation was very strong the Inquiry Officer Mr Kalicharan S Khartade gave report with speaking facts that the charges are not proved on dtd. 9.7.2912 to the Commissioner Mr Kumar Santosh. But Mr Kumar Santosh was very shrewd having worked in the vigilance unit of echelon level in the CBEC that it was very safe for him to drop the chargeaheet on the basis of inquiry officer report but not without charging fees.The fees was determined as Rs 2 lacs not in cash but in the

form of iasuing sale deed of a prime plot (in my name) at Aurangabd besides National Highway in the heart of city and prime locality BUT MY HUSBAND DENIED.To earn bargaining time the inquiry officer report dtd. 9.7.2012 was purposely delayed and along with the TENTATIVE DECISION DTD 17.8.2012 was served to my husband on 22.8.2012 ie after one and half month.

My husband junior was promoted on 6.7.2012 and for the pendency of chargesheet dtd. 4.6.2008 my husband promotion ( the honour for which he was waiting for more than 17 years of dedicated and devoyed service ) was stopped by the department. Therefore without expensing any time he
prepared the reply and gave the same to ghe related section within one hour of receipt of tentative decision for reply.As I said earlier the shrewdness of Mr Kumar Santosh he purposely put the personal hearing on 14.9.2012 (only to bargain with my husband). It is very clear in my husband reply dtd. 22.8.2012 that the inquiry report and the tentative decision report in favour of my hsband decisionshould be given early in his favour.My husband in response to the personal hearing reiterated his say to pass in his favour early by taking into account each and every point/word of his representation.

Mr Kumar Santosh tried all his tactics to surmount pressure on my husband but as my husband didnot succumbed to this therefore what they did this time is that as the zerox copy of inquiry report is given and stated to signed copy of the delegated officer Mr Dinesh Pangarkar under the covering letter of inked signature; the zerox copy of disciplinary order dtd 28.9.2012 is given by calling my husband in the Vigilance Section and taking the signature of my husband on the office copy of this disciplinary ordet wherein husband while recieving the copy has written on the office copy that ZEROX COPY OF DISCIPLINARY ORDER RECEIVED".
Later on again messages were passed to agree to terms of Mr Kumar Santosh, Commissioner, Central Excise, Aurangabad my husband didnot responded, my husband is given the zerox copy of SINGLE PAGE LTR DTD 19.11.2012 adressed to CC, Nagpur ON 20.11.2012.

My husband feeling disgusted, restless for insulted as the due honour to him is purposely delayed and when found himself believed that he is not going to get the promotion without fulfilling the demands of Mr Kumar Santosh and Company, he is forced to file the RTI.
After filing of RTI dtd 21.12.2012 by my husband in the office of Mr Kumar Santosh, Chief Commissioner Office- Nagpur/Mumbai-I, CBEC-New Delhi; Mr Kumar Santosh through his accounts section prepared a BACK DATED "PUNISHMENT PAY FIXATION ORDER office copy passed by Mr Dinesh Pangarkar, Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Aurangabad dtd. 21.11.2012 Attestes by ACAO, Central Excise and served this order on 7.1.2013. The logical point here is that the basis to this order is given as the Disciplinary Order dtd. 16.11.2012 on the chargesheet dtd 4.6.2008 where on earlier on 28.9.2012 already has been passed and status on 7.1.2013 is
that it had been served to my husband on 28.9.2012 and attained full and permanent status. The new order is stated to impose penalty of reducing one increment for the period of two years.
THE POSITION AS ON DATE IS THAT THIS NEW DISCIPLINARY ORDER DTD 16.11.2012 IS NOT SERVED TO MY HUSBAND AND ARBITARILY PROMOTION OF MY HUSBAND IS PUT IN DISPUTE ALONG WITH HIS REDUCTION OF PAY FROM SALARY OF JANUARY 2013.
The logical questions posed here is as under:-
1.why the disciplinary order dtd 16.11.2012 is not yet served?
2.why it took 47 days to serve the order dtd. 21.11.2012 on 7.1.2013 when my husband was not on leave?
3.If the order dtd 21.11.2012 has been passed why it is not implemented that is why pay is not reduced in the month of November 2012, if not in November 2012 then why not in December 2012.
4. How now in February 2013 a alert circular is issued that the inward/outward register of accounts section of Mr Kumar Santosh is lost and that to for the month of Nov and December 2013.
5. Why the related inspector of Vigilance Section Mr Patel applied for VRS at a young age and VRS also accepted immediately by Mr Kumar Santosh and and Mr Patel relieved from dutiea.
6.Why zerox copy of inquiry and earlier disciplinary order is given and next disciplinary order not served?
7.Why forensic ink, signature and handwriting expert regarding handwritten corrected draft of Mr Vatan Kamble, Signatures of Sixteen officers, ink dating as to whether Mrs Janaki Arunkumar signed on 13.6.2008 or 25.6.2008 ie on the date she is not the competent authority, signature comparison report on the zerox copy of disciplinary order dtd 28.9.2012 as to whether this are the signatures of Mr Kumar Santosh and the signaturres on the zerox copy of tje inquiry report dtd 9.7.2012 who is now IAS VIJAYWADA MR KALICHARAN S KHARTADE,.
8.As to from which authority Mr Kumar Santosh owes authority to impose penalty on my husband when the chargesheet didnot mention the contravention of CCS Rule, because after confirming the contravention of certain RULE penalty can be imposef forcontravention of it?
9. Overriding the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the RTI ACT, 2005; WHAT AUTHORITY authorises Mr Kumar Santosh to conduct preliminary inquiry against my husband.
There are also questions from which it can be proved as to how CORRURPTION IS ENFORCED.
it is requested yo all members to watch ghe hindi film KUDRAT KA KANOON.

It is requesfed to keep my name disclosed and extend whatever help to my husband and my hisband may be contacted for more details an
nd records but with the express mention of the Department.

My hisband has represented to all the higher officers but invain and the VIGILANCE AEARENESS WEEK HAS ONLY BECAME YHE CELEBRATION has to be fully accepted by all.


mained in the custody of the industries



Hotkar that in short timehe will meet the Commissioner Shri. D.S.Negi and will see that all the irregularities put up by husband are addressed and gave the copy of this his hand corrected draft. Later on this meber made certain adjustment with the administration and from that day onwards he became the partner in the share of corruption from the administration besides bagging top price postings and staying in sensitive postings as if he had been the exception to rules. In turn Mr Vatan Kamble gave the administration on his letter pad of the Union the appreciation certificates for the incumbent Commissioner and the administration.
the industries for which my husband objected. The incharge Assistant Commissioners Mr R S Sanghia, Mr Man Singh and the Joint Commissioners didnot liked the objection of my husband because there earnings from the industry was going to effect instead my husband was advised to enjoy the opportunities. When my husband was not ready to go against the prescribed rules as per the CBEC Manual his charge was withdrawn and without diong any work he eeceived the Govt. Salary against the principlpes of Honble Supreme Court Judgement of "NO WORK NO PAY'.


However my husband continued with representating Mrs Janaki Arunkumar, Commissioner, Central Excise Mr Malu, Mr Jadhav and Mr Bengali, Assistant
Commissioner as a counter attack were harssing my husband by one or the other way.Atlast as a last resort to teach a lesson to my husband Mr Malu at the time leaving office passed atrocitic sentence for which my husband was requesting this officer not to do such acts otherwise my husband has to approach the competent authority. Afraid with this Mr Anil Mukunddas Malu filed false FIR against my huaband as he was objected for corruption
through various represemtation by my husband.

Having no alternative as the Commissioner was remaining passive but my husband could be trapped in the Court Hassles my husband finally made representation with the SC Commission Delhi, PM/FM and other competent officers for this matter and the irregularities,  the Commissioner Mrs Janaki Arunkumar inspite having no powers with her to issue the Disciplinary Ordet being irregularities of her also,; against the Vigilance Manual she issued chargesheet to my husband on 10.6.2008. The chargesheet dinot accompanied the necessary evidences and explanations as requested by my husband for filing reply, the Commissioner in hurry and after relieved from the post signed letter on 25.6.2008 when on records she was relieved from the post of Commissioner on 13.6.2008.

Instead of taking action against the erring officers reported above the department issued chargesheet as referred above as if like " PUTTING PERSON BEHIND BAR WHO HAD APPROACHED FOR HELP ",

Why Mrs Janaki Arunkumar donot took action against Mr Malu it was because he was the President of Superintendent Association. Why Mrs Janaki Arunkumar didnot take action against Mr Deepak Jadhav and Administrative Officer Mr Yeshwant Gedam it is because they besides giving money to Mts Janaki Arunkumar gave the plot at Aurangabd in VIMAN NAGAR, opposite airport,
aurangabad for which my husband has given Rs 10000 as earnest money.On stepping of Mrs Commissioners name my husband was given back his money and plot was given to Mrs Commissioner which was only for the staff as per the society rules which was later on changed. One of the reason of Mrs Kumar annoyance was my husband didnot easily stepped out from this deal.Later on all the members of the society of Mrs Kumar enjoyed and are still bagging precious postings against the sensitive and non sensitive norms prescribed by the department.

In order to purposely harass my husband the issues of 2005 representatioms were made part of chargesheet dtd 10.6.2008 without proper conduct of inquiry as required before issue of chargesheet arbitarily.The inquiry officer was instituted in Feb 2011 that is after six years for the matter of 2005.POINT TO BE NOTED HERE IS THAT THE MATTER OF 2005 I.E UPTO AUGUST 2007 WERE CLOSED BECAUSE MY HUSBAND WAS AWARDED THE ACP BENEFITS AFTER DUE CONDUCT OF DPC AND VIGILANCE CLEARANCE. To harass my husband the inquiry officer did the enquiiries of about 45 minutes on an average per inquiry and for such four inquiries he took 18 months because my husband didnot offerred any corruption.
The story of harassment of my husband didnot end here nay from here onwards it became bullet train from the slow passengee rail train

The defence of my husband by way of representation was very strong the Inquiry Officer Mr Kalicharan S Khartade gave report with speaking facts that the charges are not proved on dtd. 9.7.2912 to the Commissioner Mr Kumar Santosh. But Mr Kumar Santosh was very shrewd having worked in the vigilance unit of echelon level in the CBEC that it was very safe for him to drop the chargesheett on the basis of inquiry officer report but not without charging fees.The fees was determined as Rs 2 lacs not in cash but in the form of issuing sale deed of a prime plot (in my name) at Aurangabd besides National Highway in the heart of city and prime locality BUT MY HUSBAND DENIED.To earn bargaining time the inquiry officer report dtd. 9.7.2012 was purposely delayed and along with the TENTATIVE DECISION DTD 17.8.2012 was served to my husband on 22.8.2012 ie after one and half month

My husband junior was promoted on 6.7.2012 and for the pendency of chargesheet dtd. 4.6.2008 my husband promotion ( the honour for which he was waiting for more than 17 years of dedicated and devoyed service ) was stopped by the department. Therefore without expensing any time he prepared the reply and gave the same to ghe related section within one hour of receipt of tentative decision for reply.As I said earlier the shrewdness of Mr Kumar Santosh he purposely put the personal hearing on 14.9.2012 (only to bargain with my husband). It is very clear in my husband reply dtd. 22.8.2012 that the inquiry report and the tentative decision report in favour of my hsband decisionshould be given early in his favour.My husband in response to the personal hearing reiterated his say to pass in his favour early by taking into account each and every point/word of his representation.

Mr Kumar Santosh tried all his tactics to surmount pressure on my husband but as my husband didnot succumbed to this therefore what they did this time is that as the zerox copy of inquiry report is given and stated to signed copy of the delegated officer Mr Dinesh Pangarkar under the
covering letter of inked signature; the zerox copy of disciplinary order dtd 28.9.2012 is given by calling my husband in the Vigilance Section and taking the signature of my husband on the office copy of this disciplinary ordet wherein husband while recieving the copy has written on the office copy that ZEROX COPY OF DISCIPLINARY ORDER RECEIVED".



Later on again messages were passed to agree to terms of Mr Kumar Santosh, Commissioner, Central Excise, Aurangabad my husband didnot responded, my husband is given the zerox copy of SINGLE PAGE LTR DTD 19.11.2012 adressed to CC, Nagpur ON 20.11.2012.

My husband feeling disgusted, restless for insulted as the due honour to him is purposely delayed and when found himself believed that he is not going to get the promotion without fulfilling the demands of Mr Kumar Santosh and Company, he is forced to file the RTI.
After filing of RTI dtd 21.12.2012 by my husband in the office of Mr Kumar Santosh, Chief Commissioner Office- Nagpur/Mumbai-I, CBEC-New Delhi; Mr Kumar Santosh through his accounts section prepared a BACK DATED "PUNISHMENT PAY FIXATION ORDER office copy passed by Mr Dinesh Pangarkar, Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Aurangabad dtd. 21.11.2012 Attestes by ACAO, Central Excise and served this order on 7.1.2013. The logical point here is that
the basis to this order is given as the Disciplinary Order dtd. 16.11.2012 on the chargesheet dtd 4.6.2008 where on earlier on 28.9.2012 already has been passed and status on 7.1.2013 is
that it had been served to my husband on 28.9.2012 and attained full and permanent status. The new order is stated to impose penalty of reducing one increment for the period of two years.
THE POSITION AS ON DATE IS THAT THIS NEW DISCIPLINARY ORDER DTD 16.11.2012 IS NOT

SERVED TO MY HUSBAND AND ARBITARILY PROMOTION OF MY HUSBAND IS PUT IN DISPUTE ALONG WITH HIS REDUCTION OF PAY FROM SALARY OF JANUARY 2013.
The logical questions posed here is as under:-
1.why the disciplinary order dtd 16.11.2012 is not yet served?
2.why it took 47 days to serve the order dtd. 21.11.2012 on 7.1.2013 when my husband was not on leave?
3.If the order dtd 21.11.2012 has been passed why it is not implemented that is why pay is not reduced in the month of November 2012, if not in November 2012 then why not in December 2012.
4. How now in February 2013 a alert circular is issued that the inward/outward register of accounts section of Mr Kumar Santosh is lost and that to for the month of Nov and December 2013.


5. Why the related inspector of Vigilance Section Mr Patel applied for VRS at a young age and VRS also accepted immediately by Mr Kumar Santosh and and Mr Patel relieved from dutiea.
6.Why zerox copy of inquiry and earlier disciplinary order is given and next disciplinary order not served?


7.Why forensic ink, signature and handwriting expert regarding handwritten corrected draft of Mr Vatan Kamble, Signatures of Sixteen officers, ink dating as to whether Mrs Janaki Arunkumar signed on 13.6.2008 or 25.6.2008 ie on the date she is not the competent authority, signature comparison report on the zerox copy of disciplinary order dtd 28.9.2012 as to whether this are the signatures of Mr Kumar Santosh and the signaturres on the zerox copy of tje inquiry report dtd 9.7.2012 who is now IAS VIJAYWADA MR KALICHARAN S KHARTADE,.
8.As to from which authority Mr Kumar Santosh owes authority to impose penalty on my husband when the chargesheet didnot mention the contravention of CCS Rule, because after confirming the contravention of certain RULE penalty can be imposef forcontravention of it?
9. Overriding the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the RTI ACT, 2005; WHAT AUTHORITY authorises Mr Kumar Santosh to conduct preliminary inquiry against my husband.
There are also questions from which it can be proved as to how CORRURPTION IS ENFORCED.

it is requested yo all members to watch the hindi film KUDRAT KA KANOON.

It is requesfed to keep my name disclosed and extend whatever help to my husband and my husband may be contacted for more details and records but with the express permissionof the Department.

I have no legal knowledge but I have put my facts. It is requested to take action as deemed fit so
that I and my husband donot further land in trouble

My husband has represented to all the higher officers but invain and the VIGILANCE AEARENESS WEEK HAS ONLY BECAME YHE CELEBRATION has to be fully
mained in the custody of the industries
My husband is a bribe fighter. He is working as Inspector, Central Excise, Aurangabad. During the Vigilance Awareness Week it was told that bribe cases are to be reported with the evidence or no evidence if not known. In the cases where there is no evidence it was told that itwill be the department onus  to verify and collect evidence and will book the irregular doers and the bribe fighters will be prtected as a move towards zero tolerance for corruption. Riding over this assurance my hisband shared the information, observations and back whispers of his offcice by putting in writing with his union and Commissioner,  Central Excise,  Aurangabad.
The General Secretary of the Union Mr Vatan S Kamble, General Secretary,
NonGazetted, Central Exise Officer I.e Inspectors Association got reverified the facts from other members  of the Offcice and typed one letter adressed to Commissioner, Central Excise,  Aurangabad and made corrections on this draft and told my husband Shri. Yeshwant Sadashiv Hotkar that in short timehe will meet the Commissioner Shri. D.S.Negi and will see that all the irregularities put up by husband are addressed and gave the copy of this his hand corrected draft. Later on this meber made certain adjustment with the administration and from that day onwards he became the partner in the share of corruption from the administration besides bagging top price
postings and staying in sensitive postings as if he had been the exception to rules. In turn Mr Vatan Kamble gave the administration on his letter pad of the Union the appreciation certificates for the incumbent Commissioner and the administration.
As a voice against this sixteen officers the members of the Union started a move of signature movement where sixteen officers signed and the other members were shut giving the fear of the administration and lure by hook or crook.

During the posting in the range my husband observed that MrsJanaki Arunkumar,  Commissioner has instructed the officrrs underneath her to realise the coupons of Rs 5000 from each industry for some south based institution.My husband didnot took part.My husband also observed that his Range Superintendent Mr Anil Mukunddas Malu and Mr Deepak Jadhav were signing on the export documents of various assessees of the range from the office table without sealing the export consignments/ containers
and the sealing plier the government property were allowed to be with the industries for which my husband objected. The incharge Assistant Commissioners Mr R S Sanghia, Mr Man Singh and the Joint Commissioners didnot liked the objection of my husband because there earnings from the industry was going to effect instead my husband was advised to enjoy the opportunities. When my husband was not ready to go against the prescribed rules as per the CBEC Manual his charge was
withdrawn and without diong any work he eeceived the Govt. Salary against the principlpes of Honble Supreme Court Judgement of "NO WORK NO PAY'.
However my husband continued with representating Mrs Janaki Arunkumar, Commissioner, Central Excise Mr Malu, Mr Jadhav and Mr Bengali, Assistant
Commissioner as a counter attack were harssing my husband by one or the other way.Atlast as a last resort to teach a lesson to my husband Mr Malu at the time leaving office passed atrocitic sentence for which my husband was requesting this officer not to do such acts otherwise my husband has to approach the competent authority. Afraid with this Mr Anil Mukunddas Malu filed false FIR against my huaband as he was objected for corruption
through various represemtation by my husband.

Having no alternative as the Commissioner was remaining passive but my husband could be trapped in the Court Hassles my husband finally made
representation with the SC Commission Delhi, PM/FM and other competent officers for this matter and the irregularities,  the Commissioner Mrs Janaki Arunkumar inspite having no powers with her to issue the Disciplinary Ordet being irregularities of her also,; against the Vigilance Manual she issued chargesheet to my husband on 10.6.2008. The chargesheet dinot accompanied the necessary evidences and explanations as requested by
my husband for filing reply, the Commissioner in hurry and after relieved from the post signed letter on 25.6.2008 when on records she was relieved from the post of Commissioner on 13.6.2008.

Instead of taking action against the erring officers reported above the department issued chargesheet as referred above as if like " PUTTING PERSON BEHIND BAR WHO HAD APPROACHED FOR HELP ",

Why Mrs Janaki Arunkumar donot took action against Mr Malu it was
because he was the President of Superintendent Association. Why Mrs Janaki Arunkumar didnot take action against Mr Deepak Jadhav and Administrative Officer Mr Yeshwant Gedam it is because they besides giving money to Mts Janaki Arunkumar gave the plot at Aurangabd in VIMAN
NAGAR, opposite airport, aurangabad for which my husband has given Rs 10000 as earnest money.On stepping of Mrs Commissioners name my husband was given back his money and plot was given to Mrs Commissioner which was only for the staff as per the society rules which was later on changed. One of the reason of Mrs Kumar annoyance was my
husband didnot easily stepped out from this deal.Later on all the members of the society of Mrs Kumar enjoyed and are still bagging precious postings against the sensitive and non sensitive norms prescribed by the department.
In order to purposely harass my husband the issues of 2005 representatioms were made part of chargesheet dtd 10.6.2008 without proper conduct of inquiry as required before issue of chargesheet arbitarily.The inquiry officer was instituted in Feb 2011 that is after six years for the matter of 2005.POINT TO BE NOTED HERE IS THAT THE MATTER OF 2005 I.E UPTO AUGUST 2007 WERE CLOSED BECAUSE MY HUSBAND WAS
AWARDED THE ACP BENEFITS AFTER DUE CONDUCT OF DPC AND VIGILANCE CLEARANCE. To harass my husband the inquiry officer did the enquiiries of about 45 minutes on an average per inquiry and for such four inquiries he took 18 months because my husband didnot offerred any corruption.
The story of harassment of my husband didnot end here nay from here onwards it became bullet train from the slow passengee rail train.

The defence of my husband by way of representation was very strong the Inquiry Officer Mr Kalicharan S Khartade gave report with speaking facts that the charges are not proved on dtd. 9.7.2912 to the Commissioner Mr Kumar Santosh. But Mr Kumar Santosh was very shrewd having worked in the vigilance unit of echelon level in the CBEC that it was very safe for him to drop the chargeaheet on the basis of inquiry officer report but not without charging fees.The fees was determined as Rs 2 lacs not in cash but in the

form of iasuing sale deed of a prime plot (in my name) at Aurangabd besides National Highway in the heart of city and prime locality BUT MY HUSBAND DENIED.To earn bargaining time the inquiry officer report dtd. 9.7.2012 was purposely delayed and along with the TENTATIVE DECISION DTD 17.8.2012 was served to my husband on 22.8.2012 ie after one and half month.

My husband junior was promoted on 6.7.2012 and for the pendency of chargesheet dtd. 4.6.2008 my husband promotion ( the honour for which he was waiting for more than 17 years of dedicated and devoyed service ) was stopped by the department. Therefore without expensing any time he
prepared the reply and gave the same to ghe related section within one hour of receipt of tentative decision for reply.As I said earlier the shrewdness of Mr Kumar Santosh he purposely put the personal hearing on 14.9.2012 (only to bargain with my husband). It is very clear in my husband reply dtd. 22.8.2012 that the inquiry report and the tentative decision report in favour of my hsband decisionshould be given early in his favour.My husband in response to the personal hearing reiterated his say to pass in his favour early by taking into account each and every point/word of his representation.

Mr Kumar Santosh tried all his tactics to surmount pressure on my husband but as my husband didnot succumbed to this therefore what they did this time is that as the zerox copy of inquiry report is given and stated to signed copy of the delegated officer Mr Dinesh Pangarkar under the covering letter of inked signature; the zerox copy of disciplinary order dtd 28.9.2012 is given by calling my husband in the Vigilance Section and taking the signature of my husband on the office copy of this disciplinary ordet wherein husband while recieving the copy has written on the office copy that ZEROX COPY OF DISCIPLINARY ORDER RECEIVED".
Later on again messages were passed to agree to terms of Mr Kumar Santosh, Commissioner, Central Excise, Aurangabad my husband didnot responded, my husband is given the zerox copy of SINGLE PAGE LTR DTD 19.11.2012 adressed to CC, Nagpur ON 20.11.2012.

My husband feeling disgusted, restless for insulted as the due honour to him is purposely delayed and when found himself believed that he is not going to get the promotion without fulfilling the demands of Mr Kumar Santosh and Company, he is forced to file the RTI.
After filing of RTI dtd 21.12.2012 by my husband in the office of Mr Kumar Santosh, Chief Commissioner Office- Nagpur/Mumbai-I, CBEC-New Delhi; Mr Kumar Santosh through his accounts section prepared a BACK DATED "PUNISHMENT PAY FIXATION ORDER office copy passed by Mr Dinesh Pangarkar, Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Aurangabad dtd. 21.11.2012 Attestes by ACAO, Central Excise and served this order on 7.1.2013. The logical point here is that the basis to this order is given as the Disciplinary Order dtd. 16.11.2012 on the chargesheet dtd 4.6.2008 where on earlier on 28.9.2012 already has been passed and status on 7.1.2013 is
that it had been served to my husband on 28.9.2012 and attained full and permanent status. The new order is stated to impose penalty of reducing one increment for the period of two years.
THE POSITION AS ON DATE IS THAT THIS NEW DISCIPLINARY ORDER DTD 16.11.2012 IS NOT SERVED TO MY HUSBAND AND ARBITARILY PROMOTION OF MY HUSBAND IS PUT IN DISPUTE ALONG WITH HIS REDUCTION OF PAY FROM SALARY OF JANUARY 2013.
The logical questions posed here is as under:-
1.why the disciplinary order dtd 16.11.2012 is not yet served?
2.why it took 47 days to serve the order dtd. 21.11.2012 on 7.1.2013 when my husband was not on leave?
3.If the order dtd 21.11.2012 has been passed why it is not implemented that is why pay is not reduced in the month of November 2012, if not in November 2012 then why not in December 2012.
4. How now in February 2013 a alert circular is issued that the inward/outward register of accounts section of Mr Kumar Santosh is lost and that to for the month of Nov and December 2013.
5. Why the related inspector of Vigilance Section Mr Patel applied for VRS at a young age and VRS also accepted immediately by Mr Kumar Santosh and and Mr Patel relieved from dutiea.
6.Why zerox copy of inquiry and earlier disciplinary order is given and next disciplinary order not served?
7.Why forensic ink, signature and handwriting expert regarding handwritten corrected draft of Mr Vatan Kamble, Signatures of Sixteen officers, ink dating as to whether Mrs Janaki Arunkumar signed on 13.6.2008 or 25.6.2008 ie on the date she is not the competent authority, signature comparison report on the zerox copy of disciplinary order dtd 28.9.2012 as to whether this are the signatures of Mr Kumar Santosh and the signaturres on the zerox copy of tje inquiry report dtd 9.7.2012 who is now IAS VIJAYWADA MR KALICHARAN S KHARTADE,.
8.As to from which authority Mr Kumar Santosh owes authority to impose penalty on my husband when the chargesheet didnot mention the contravention of CCS Rule, because after confirming the contravention of certain RULE penalty can be imposef forcontravention of it?
9. Overriding the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the RTI ACT, 2005; WHAT AUTHORITY authorises Mr Kumar Santosh to conduct preliminary inquiry against my husband.
There are also questions from which it can be proved as to how CORRURPTION IS ENFORCED.
it is requested yo all members to watch ghe hindi film KUDRAT KA KANOON.

It is requesfed to keep my name disclosed and extend whatever help to my husband and my hisband may be contacted for more details an
nd records but with the express mention of the Department.

My hisband has represented to all the higher officers but invain and the VIGILANCE AEARENESS WEEK HAS ONLY BECAME YHE CELEBRATION has to be fully accepted by all.


mained in the custody of the industries

What is your reaction after reading this report?