• Bribe Fighter
  • 6 years ago

Whether d Public procecutor is for affected citizens or for culprits?

Reported on August 24, 2016 from Pune , Maharashtra  ι Report #119053

We are @3000 investors from Pune, Sangali,Aurangabad & other cities,who have invested their hard earned money with a Pune based company M/S Dhanada Corp.pvt ltd. This company is doing this business from 20 yrs. We have kept the money as fixed deposits & were getting returns as interest. Since last three years Mr & Mrs Havele the owner of this company has stopped giving interest as well as principal amount to all of us.
We have lodged a police complaint with Pune police against Havele's on 21.06.14. He was arrested & was under police custody for 10 days. After that he was released on bail as of date. Wife got anticipatory bail as of date.
With consistent follow up with police , collector office,Pune & Mantralaya Mumbai, we could raise the notification(Gazette) against the property of this company on 07.05.16 as per the MPID Act 1999 Section 4.
The same act says that the competent authority -in our case SDO ,Haveli, Pune.- has to file an affidavit in the Sessions court Pune within one month of declaration of gazette. Till date it is not done. On 19.08.16, we visited sessions court Pune & met Mr.Sunil Hande (PP) along with an officer from SDO Haveli office.
But inspite of repeated requests to get the affidavit done, Mr.Hande is telling us all other stories which are not related to this case.How much he has to take trouble for this case & etc etc. In fact he has not at all appeared in the court for the hearing of our case from last five months. Overall his approach is we should pay him some bribe,which we could not afford to do the work of affidavit. Hence the subject question-whether the PP is for .......................?
Our work is held up for this persons attitude.
What to do next?????????????

What is your reaction after reading this report?